Surf foil

Armstrong, 2024

Midlength Mk I (Midlength FG)

1651mm long · 5'5"

457mm wide

105mm thick

55litres

Sizes & Numbers

Listed by the brand, read off a photo, or worked out: where every number comes from

In one line

A finer nose than most. A rounded pin tail, a medium nose and gently curved rails.

derived · against the 77 other surf foil boards in the atlas, read off the outlines.

As listed by Armstrong

Armstrong Midlength Mk I (Midlength FG): every size as listed by Armstrong
sizelengthwidththicknessweight
38 L4’9 · 1448 mm432 mm89 mm3.2–3.8 kg
45 L5’1 · 1549 mm432 mm95 mm3.7–4 kg
55 L5’5 · 1651 mm457 mm105 mm4.1–4.6 kg
65 L5’9 · 1753 mm483 mm114 mm4.6–5.1 kg
75 L6’1 · 1854 mm508 mm118 mm5.1–5.6 kg
85 L6’5 · 1956 mm527 mm124 mm5.6–6.1 kg
100 L6’9 · 2057 mm559 mm127 mm6.2–6.7 kg

Every size side by side, tails on one line, one scale

205714480 mm144838 L432 w154945 L435 w165155 L460 w175365 L486 w185475 L518 w195685 L533 w2057100 L562 w

Next to your board?

Lay the Armstrong Midlength 55 L over up to four others, at one scale.

Compare with…

Generations

After it · Mk II X-Form, 2026

The Mk II X-Form 65 L is 25 mm shorter and 16 mm wider than the Mk I (Midlength FG) 65 L; its wide point moved 39 mm toward the tail. Open the Mk II X-Form

listed length and width · wide point derived

Mk I (Midlength FG) 65 L over the Mk II X-Form 65 L, tails aligned, one scale
Mk I (Midlength FG) 65 L Mk II X-Form 65 L

The Armstrong Midlength over time

Shape & Rocker

From above, then from the side, true scale · the chosen size solid, the others dashed

Armstrong Midlength Mk I (Midlength FG) from above and from the side, every size at true scale, tails aligned
Armstrong Midlength Mk I (Midlength FG) from the side, true proportions: the bottom's rocker over a flat table, every size

Read off the 38 L outline · derived

54 %wide point, 778 mm from the tail

3.35length over width

346mm wide 12″ from the tail

4,907cm² of planform

Read off the 45 L outline · derived

53 %wide point, 815 mm from the tail

3.57length over width

336mm wide 12″ from the tail

5,286cm² of planform

Read off the 55 L outline · derived

54 %wide point, 887 mm from the tail

3.59length over width

352mm wide 12″ from the tail

5,965cm² of planform

Read off the 65 L outline · derived

53 %wide point, 928 mm from the tail

3.61length over width

363mm wide 12″ from the tail

6,699cm² of planform

Read off the 75 L outline · derived

54 %wide point, 996 mm from the tail

3.58length over width

388mm wide 12″ from the tail

7,612cm² of planform

Read off the 85 L outline · derived

52 %wide point, 1024 mm from the tail

3.67length over width

390mm wide 12″ from the tail

8,247cm² of planform

Read off the 100 L outline · derived

51 %wide point, 1040 mm from the tail

3.66length over width

410mm wide 12″ from the tail

9,228cm² of planform

Rocker of the 38 L · scaled from the 55 L measured

61 mmtail rocker, at the tip
8 mm12″ from the tail
18 mm12″ from the nose
99 mmnose rocker, at the tip
486 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 29 % to 63 % of the length
47 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
105 mmat its thickest, 48 % from the tail
37 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat

Lay this rocker over other boards

Rocker of the 45 L · scaled from the 55 L measured

66 mmtail rocker, at the tip
10 mm12″ from the tail
22 mm12″ from the nose
107 mmnose rocker, at the tip
506 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 30 % to 63 % of the length
47 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
113 mmat its thickest, 48 % from the tail
39 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat

Lay this rocker over other boards

Rocker of the 55 L · measured

71 mmtail rocker, at the tip
12 mm12″ from the tail
26 mm12″ from the nose
115 mmnose rocker, at the tip
524 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 31 % to 62 % of the length
47 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
124 mmat its thickest, 48 % from the tail · on the photo; Armstrong lists 105 mm
42 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat

Lay this rocker over other boards

Rocker of the 65 L · scaled from the 55 L measured

75 mmtail rocker, at the tip
14 mm12″ from the tail
30 mm12″ from the nose
122 mmnose rocker, at the tip
538 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 31 % to 62 % of the length
47 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
136 mmat its thickest, 48 % from the tail
45 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat

Lay this rocker over other boards

Rocker of the 75 L · scaled from the 55 L measured

80 mmtail rocker, at the tip
16 mm12″ from the tail
34 mm12″ from the nose
130 mmnose rocker, at the tip
552 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 32 % to 61 % of the length
47 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
139 mmat its thickest, 48 % from the tail
47 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat

Lay this rocker over other boards

Rocker of the 85 L · scaled from the 55 L measured

85 mmtail rocker, at the tip
18 mm12″ from the tail
38 mm12″ from the nose
138 mmnose rocker, at the tip
563 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 32 % to 61 % of the length
47 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
147 mmat its thickest, 48 % from the tail
50 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat

Lay this rocker over other boards

Rocker of the 100 L · scaled from the 55 L measured

89 mmtail rocker, at the tip
21 mm12″ from the tail
42 mm12″ from the nose
146 mmnose rocker, at the tip
574 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 33 % to 61 % of the length
47 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
151 mmat its thickest, 48 % from the tail
52 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat

Lay this rocker over other boards

True proportions · dots at 10 mm and 12″ in from each tip · bracket: flat to within 3 mm · Measured on Armstrong's photo of the 55 L. Tail end set by Armstrong's photo convention, not checked by a person.

Reviews & Videos

Original pages · 1

Similar Boards

Closest outlines from other models, once stretched to one length and width · derived