Gong Wing Foil Cruzader Point LW FSP Pro 2025
Foil › Wing
Gong, 2024
Wing Foil Cruzader Point FSP Pro 2024
1985mm long · 6'6"
460mm wide
187mm thick
112litres
Sizes & Numbers
Listed by the brand, read off a photo, or worked out: where every number comes from
In one line
Longer and leaner than most. A pin tail, a medium nose and gently curved rails.
derived · against the 169 other wing foil boards in the atlas, read off the outlines.
As listed by Gong
| size | length | width | thickness | weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 L | 157.5cm · 1575 mm | 430 mm | 114 mm | – |
| 62 L | 162.6cm · 1626 mm | 435 mm | 132 mm | – |
| 67 L | 157.5cm · 1575 mm | 530 mm | 121 mm | – |
| 72 L | 167.6cm · 1676 mm | 440 mm | 149 mm | – |
| 77 L | 162.6cm · 1626 mm | 535 mm | 133 mm | – |
| 82 L | 172.7cm · 1727 mm | 445 mm | 162 mm | – |
| 87 L | 167.6cm · 1676 mm | 540 mm | 146 mm | – |
| 92 L | 182.9cm · 1829 mm | 449 mm | 172 mm | – |
| 97 L | 172.7cm · 1727 mm | 545 mm | 157 mm | – |
| 102 L | 190.5cm · 1905 mm | 456 mm | 178 mm | – |
| 107 L | 182.9cm · 1829 mm | 549 mm | 164 mm | – |
| 112 L | 198.5cm · 1985 mm | 460 mm | 187 mm | – |
| 117 L | 190.5cm · 1905 mm | 556 mm | 168 mm | – |
| 122 L | 213.4cm · 2134 mm | 470 mm | 184 mm | – |
| 127 L | 198.5cm · 1985 mm | 560 mm | 175 mm | – |
| 132 L | 228.6cm · 2286 mm | 479 mm | 184 mm | – |
| 137 L | 213.4cm · 2134 mm | 570 mm | 172 mm | – |
| 142 L | 248.9cm · 2489 mm | 491 mm | 179 mm | – |
| 147 L | 228.6cm · 2286 mm | 579 mm | 172 mm | – |
| 157 L | 248.9cm · 2489 mm | 591 mm | 167 mm | – |
Every size side by side, tails on one line, one scale
Generations
After it · 2026
The 2026 75 L is 25 mm wider than the 2024 77 L, same length; its wide point moved 49 mm toward the tail. Open the 2026
listed length and width · wide point derived
Shape & Rocker
From above, then from the side, true scale · the chosen size solid, the others dashed
Read off the 52 L outline · derived
53 %wide point, 839 mm from the tail
3.66length over width
340mm wide 12″ from the tail
5,346cm² of planform
Read off the 62 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 885 mm from the tail
3.74length over width
335mm wide 12″ from the tail
5,560cm² of planform
Read off the 67 L outline · derived
53 %wide point, 832 mm from the tail
2.98length over width
417mm wide 12″ from the tail
6,556cm² of planform
Read off the 72 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 913 mm from the tail
3.81length over width
334mm wide 12″ from the tail
5,793cm² of planform
Read off the 77 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 885 mm from the tail
3.04length over width
412mm wide 12″ from the tail
6,838cm² of planform
Read off the 82 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 940 mm from the tail
3.89length over width
334mm wide 12″ from the tail
6,034cm² of planform
Read off the 87 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 913 mm from the tail
3.10length over width
410mm wide 12″ from the tail
7,112cm² of planform
Read off the 92 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 996 mm from the tail
4.07length over width
329mm wide 12″ from the tail
6,460cm² of planform
Read off the 97 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 940 mm from the tail
3.17length over width
409mm wide 12″ from the tail
7,392cm² of planform
Read off the 102 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1037 mm from the tail
4.18length over width
327mm wide 12″ from the tail
6,823cm² of planform
Read off the 107 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 996 mm from the tail
3.33length over width
402mm wide 12″ from the tail
7,898cm² of planform
Read off the 112 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1081 mm from the tail
4.37length over width
320mm wide 12″ from the tail
7,087cm² of planform
Read off the 117 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1037 mm from the tail
3.43length over width
399mm wide 12″ from the tail
8,320cm² of planform
Read off the 122 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1162 mm from the tail
4.54length over width
320mm wide 12″ from the tail
7,883cm² of planform
Read off the 127 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1081 mm from the tail
3.54length over width
395mm wide 12″ from the tail
8,744cm² of planform
Read off the 132 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1245 mm from the tail
4.77length over width
316mm wide 12″ from the tail
8,615cm² of planform
Read off the 137 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1162 mm from the tail
3.74length over width
388mm wide 12″ from the tail
9,560cm² of planform
Read off the 142 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1355 mm from the tail
5.07length over width
310mm wide 12″ from the tail
9,597cm² of planform
Read off the 147 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1245 mm from the tail
3.95length over width
382mm wide 12″ from the tail
10,412cm² of planform
Read off the 157 L outline · derived
54 %wide point, 1355 mm from the tail
4.21length over width
373mm wide 12″ from the tail
11,556cm² of planform
Rocker of the 52 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 29 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 0 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 22 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 108 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 784 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 14 % to 64 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 114 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 69 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 62 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 31 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 0 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 24 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 112 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 806 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 14 % to 64 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 132 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 71 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 67 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 29 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 0 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 22 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 108 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 784 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 14 % to 64 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 121 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 69 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 72 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 32 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 0 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 26 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 116 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 827 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 14 % to 64 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 149 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 73 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 77 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 31 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 0 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 24 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 112 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 806 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 14 % to 64 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 133 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 71 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 82 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 34 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 1 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 28 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 120 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 849 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 14 % to 64 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 162 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 75 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 87 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 32 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 0 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 26 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 116 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 827 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 14 % to 64 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 146 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 73 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 92 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 37 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 1 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 32 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 127 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 892 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 171 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 80 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 97 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 34 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 1 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 28 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 120 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 849 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 14 % to 64 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 157 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 75 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 102 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 40 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 2 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 35 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 133 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 924 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 178 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 83 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 107 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 37 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 1 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 32 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 127 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 892 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 163 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 80 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 112 L · borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 42 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 2 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 39 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 139 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 957 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 187 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 87 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 117 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 40 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 2 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 35 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 133 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 924 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 168 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 83 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 122 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 47 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 4 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 45 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 151 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 1019 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 184 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 93 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 127 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 42 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 2 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 39 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 139 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 957 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 175 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 87 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 132 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 52 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 6 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 52 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 162 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 1083 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 184 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 100 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 137 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 47 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 4 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 45 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 151 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 1019 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 171 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 93 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 142 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 59 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 8 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 62 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 178 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 1167 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 62 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 179 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 109 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 147 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 52 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 6 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 52 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 162 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 1083 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 63 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 171 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 100 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
Rocker of the 157 L · scaled from the 112 L, borrowed (≈), estimated
≈ 59 mmtail rocker, at the tip
≈ 8 mm12″ from the tail
≈ 62 mm12″ from the nose
≈ 178 mmnose rocker, at the tip
≈ 1167 mmflat to within 3 mm, from 15 % to 62 % of the length
56 %of the length to the lowest point, from the tail
≈ 167 mmat its thickest, 56 % from the tail
≈ 109 mmlonger along the bottom curve than flat
True proportions · dots at 10 mm and 12″ in from each tip · bracket: flat to within 3 mm · drawn hollow: no usable side photo of this board · No usable side photo of this board: from Gong's photo of the Wing Foil Cruzader Point FSP Pro 2026, the same line with other dimensions, 2 years later. Tail end set by Gong's photo convention on the Wing Foil Cruzader Point FSP Pro 2026's photo, not checked by a person. · estimated
Reviews & Videos
Original pages · 1
- The Gong Wing Foil Cruzader Point FSP Pro 2024 page gong-galaxy.com · product page · sizes, specs, photos
Similar Boards
Closest outlines from other models, once stretched to one length and width · derived
Gong Surf Foil Scura EPS Pro 2024
Foil › Surf foil
Gong Surf Foil Scura EPS 2024
Foil › Surf foil
Gong Surf Foil Scura FSP Pro 2024
Foil › Surf foil
F-One Rocket Wing - S 2026
Foil › Wing
F-One Rocket Wing - S Carbon 2026
Foil › Wing
Gong Wing Foil Cruzader Point Hollow Carbon 2027
Foil › Wing
Gong Surf Foil Scura EPS Pro 2026
Foil › Surf foil
Gong Surf Foil Scura FSP Pro 2026
Foil › Surf foil
Armstrong Downwind Mk II (Downwind FG)
Foil › Downwind